2013 WILLIAM L. WILLIAMS LECTURE (Feb. 27 at 4:00 PM)<br><i>Science: The Public, Congress and You</i> -- Michael S. Lubell
- All News
- Search News
- Archived News
- Physicist Steven Cundiff Elected as Fellow of AAAS
- Observing the Dance of Ten Million Quantum Dots
- Physics Professor Tim McKay Explains ECoach Tool Now Used for All First-Year U-M Students
- Physicist Mark Newman's Scientific Cartogram Maps Featured in Washington Post
- U-M Physics Professor Tim McKay Developed Coaching Software to Help Students
- 11 Surprising Predictions for 2017 From Some of The Biggest Names In Science
- New Metamaterial Can Switch from Hard to Soft—And Back Again
- Physicist Lu Li and Team First to Uncover Rotational Symmetry Breaking in Magnetic Property of Unconventional Superconductor
- Physicist Michal Zochowski Collaborates with LSA Professor Sara Aton for ‘The Science of Sleep’
- Next-Gen Dark Matter Detector in a Race to Finish Line
- Physicist Roberto Merlin Selected as 2017 OSA Lippincott Award Recipient
- Michigan at the March for Science
- Norman M. Leff Assistant Professor Joshua Spitz Quoted in Scientific American Article
- All Events
- Special Lectures
- K-12 Programs
- Saturday Morning Physics
- Seminars & Colloquia
William L. Williams (1937-1986) was on the University of Michigan Physics faculty for 21 of the 49 years of his life. Renowned as an atomic physicist, he served the University as Professor,
as Associate Chair of Physics, and as Associate Dean of the College of Literature, Science,
and the Arts.
This lecture will be presented by Professor Williams' friend and colleague
Michael S. Lubell (CCNY, Director of Public Affairs; American Physical Society).
Abstract: Polling of public attitudes toward science contains very mixed results. By a margin of 93 to 7 the public believes the U.S. should be a global leader in science, and two out of three people approve using taxpayer funds to support research. But of 1400 respondents, nearly one in two give the federal government a grade of C, D, or F for its innovation efforts, and 50 percent believe the federal research budget is too large. Lacking knowledge about the benefits that accrue, the public ranks science second among federal programs prime for cutting. At a time when deficits and debt are forcing reductions in federal spending, legislators and policymakers - even those who are staunch science advocates - will pay close attention to opinions voters hold. Although the science community continues to devote considerable resources to public outreach, the reach is thin and the focus is narrow. Communicating the excitement of science to an already engaged audience is important and should continue. But marketing the value of research across the broad arena is critical and must begin now. Without increased awareness of the tangible good science delivers, the average voter will raise little objection to budgets that slash federal support for research.
Refreshments will be available in 337 West Hall (across the hall from the lecture room) prior to the talk.